Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sports Economics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1527002508325817v1
10/3/292    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krautmann, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Donley, T. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Shirking in Major League Baseball Revisited

Anthony C. Krautmann

DePaul University, akrautma{at}depaul.edu

Thomas D. Donley

DePaul University

A number of studies in sports economics looked at the shirking problem inherent in long-term contracts. Shirking is inferred if the player's actual performance falls below expected performance in the year following a newly signed long-term contract. In an attempt to shed light on these conflicting conclusions in the literature, we outline a novel approach for testing opportunistic behavior. We begin by running a standard test of shirking based upon a comparison of the player's expected to realized performance. We then introduce a new approach to analyzing shirking—one which is based on a comparison of a player's expected to realized Marginal Revenue Product. We find that tests for shirking are sensitive to the approach one uses in the analysis. In particular, when testing for opportunistic behavior using performance, we find no evidence of shirking. Yet when we conduct the test based on MRP, our tests suggest that players signing multi-year contracts create less value than they were expected to generate.

Key Words: shirking in Major League Baseball • long-term contract incentives

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 292-304 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1527002508325817


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?