Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sports Economics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Von Allmen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Is the Reward System in NASCAR Efficient?

Peter Von Allmen

Moravian College

This article provides an overview of compensation and reward schemes in professional automobile racing (NASCAR). Data from the 1998 and 1999 racing seasons show that although end-of-season rewards are highly nonlinear, individual races offer rewards that are more linear. Given that the general conditions for a rank order tournament do exist, this may indicate that the reward scheme is inefficient. Several hypotheses are suggested to explain why NASCAR would create such a reward structure. Vital to the investigation is the fact that teams attempt to maximize a profit function more complex than those in other individual sports. In addition, drivers may exhibit excessively aggressive behavior that would be exacerbated by nonlinear compensation, as described by Lazear. Analysis shows that the need to maintain sponsorship exposure, combined with drivers’ willingness to take risks (and the possible catastrophic result of negative outcomes), creates a competitive environment where winner-take-all would be inefficient.

Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 62-79 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/152700250100200106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
M. Hood
Consistency on the PGA Tour
Journal of Sports Economics, October 1, 2008; 9(5): 504 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
T. Lallemand, R. Plasman, and F. Rycx
Women and Competition in Elimination Tournaments: Evidence From Professional Tennis Data
Journal of Sports Economics, February 1, 2008; 9(1): 3 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
J. T. Schwartz, J. P. Isaacs, and A. M. Carilli
To Race or to Place?: An Empirical Investigation of the Efficiency of the NASCAR Points Competition
Journal of Sports Economics, December 1, 2007; 8(6): 633 - 641.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
C. A. Depken II and D. P. Wilson
The Efficiency of the NASCAR Reward System: Initial Empirical Evidence
Journal of Sports Economics, November 1, 2004; 5(4): 371 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]