Journal of Sports Economics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 204-228 (2002)

The Many Dimensions of Competitive Balance

Allen R. Sanderson

The University of Chicago

Discussions of competitive imbalance use Major League Baseball as a focal point, and proposed remedies center on redistributions of revenues from well-heeled owners to financially strapped franchises. However, there are also many additional aspects in sports that do not involve allocations of economic resources directly but nevertheless affect outcomes and balance among competitors. All leagues and associations have to confront the fundamental issue of relative strengths between adversaries. To create some semblance of balance and ensure the integrity of play, they place constraints on the competitive process and respond to technological changes that threaten to disrupt the current environment, including the use of performance-enhancing inputs. Although we extol the virtues of natural athletes and level playing fields with regard to skill development, ensuring evenly matched contests, and comparing performances over time, there are arguably no consistent, objective standards we can employ. Imbalance is an inherent, intractable part of all competitions.

Key Words: competitive balance • natural versus unnatural competition • excessive competition • integrity of play • performance-enhancing substances


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
R. Fort
Comments on ``Measuring Parity''
Journal of Sports Economics, December 1, 2007; 8(6): 642 - 651.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
J. R. Crooker and A. J. Fenn
Sports Leagues and Parity When League Parity Generates Fan Enthusiasm
Journal of Sports Economics, May 1, 2007; 8(2): 139 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
A. R. Sanderson and J. J. Siegfried
Thinking about Competitive Balance
Journal of Sports Economics, November 1, 2003; 4(4): 255 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]