Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sports Economics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Testing Market Efficiency in the Major League Baseball Over-Under Betting Market

Kenneth H. Brown

University of Northern Iowa

Fred J. Abraham

University of Northern Iowa

This article tests market efficiency in the over-under betting market for Major League Baseball using data from the 1996 through 2000 seasons. It is shown that a simple betting strategy based on streaks was profitable for the 1997 season but was not profitable for any of the other years studied. The 1997 season involved expansion, realignment, and the introduction of interleague play to Major League Baseball. These changes in the league’s structure may have created uncertainty in player and team performance, which allowed this strategy to be profitable. The article argues, however, that the over-under betting market for baseball is efficient because the profitability of this strategy was eliminated in the following years.

Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 311-319 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/152700250200300401
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
J. M. Gandar, R. A. Zuber, and R. S. Johnson
A Reexamination of the Efficiency of the Betting Market on National Hockey League Games
Journal of Sports Economics, May 1, 2004; 5(2): 152 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
R. J. Paul and A. P. Weinbach
"Testing Market Efficiency in the Major League Baseball Over-Under Betting Market"
Journal of Sports Economics, February 1, 2004; 5(1): 93 - 95.
[PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
K. H. Brown and F. J. Abraham
"Testing Market Efficiency in the Major League Baseball Over-Under Betting Market": Response to Paul and Weinbach's Comment
Journal of Sports Economics, February 1, 2004; 5(1): 96 - 99.
[PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
J. M. Gandar and R. A. Zuber
An Evaluation of the Debate Over "Testing Market Efficiency in the Major League Baseball Over-Under Betting Market"
Journal of Sports Economics, February 1, 2004; 5(1): 100 - 105.
[PDF]