This Article Full Text (PDF) Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Covington, R. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

(How Much) is the Law to Blame for Baseball's Turbulent Labor Relations?

Vanderbilt Law School

Three bodies of law have had significant impact on labor relations in professional sports including baseball. The first, antitrust law, was not available in baseball until 1998. Players in the National Football League used antitrust law effectively against owners in the 1980s, but it is now available only to players outside a formal collective bargaining relationship. The second, National Labor Relations Act, has been used by both owners and player unions to achieve specific objectives, but doctrines developed under the statute have contributed to posturing and to crisis bargaining. The third, a specialized contract law developed for interpreting and enforcing collective bargaining agreements, has generally worked fairly well in professional sports, particularly the principles encouraging the use of arbitration.

Key Words: antitrust • arbitration • collective bargaining • contract • labor relations • National Labor Relations Act • Taft-Hartley Act • unions

Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 4, No. 4, 356-361 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1527002503257389


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?