Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sports Economics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Outlier Aversion in Subjective Evaluation

Evidence From World Figure Skating Championships

Jungmin Lee

Florida International University

The quality of subjective performance evaluation is dependent on the incentive structures evaluators face. Figure skating competitions provide a unique opportunity to study subjective evaluation. Using scoring data from World Figure Skating Championships between 2001 and 2003, I test for the existence of "outlier aversion" in which subjective evaluators avoid submitting outlying judgments. I find that judges manipulate scores to achieve a targeted level of agreement with the other judges. Agreement may not be a good criterion for the validity of an evaluation system, consistent with the recent applied psychology and management literature.

Key Words: subjective performance evaluation • outlier aversion • figure skating

Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 141-159 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1527002507299203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OXF ECON PAPHome page
T. Coupe, V. Ginsburgh, and A. Noury
Are leading papers of better quality? Evidence from a natural experiment
Oxf. Econ. Pap., June 19, 2009; (2009) gpp019v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]