Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sports Economics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Siegfried, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Thinking about Competitive Balance

Allen R. Sanderson

University of Chicago

John J. Siegfried

Vanderbilt University

Simon Rottenberg long ago noted that the nature of sports is such that competitors must be of approximately equal ability if any are to be financially successful. In recent years, sports commentators and fans, Major League Baseball itself, and even some economists have expressed growing concern about the widening disparities between team expenditures and the growing concentrations of postseason contenders and championships. In this article, the authors compare different concepts of competitive balance, review the theoretical and empirical scholarship on competitive balance and the relationship between payrolls and performance, describe the natural forces and institutional rules and regulations that contribute to observed distributions of playing performances, and evaluate the likely effect of several popular proposals—payroll and salary caps, luxury taxes, and increased revenue sharing—on competitive balance. Although the focus is on baseball, frequent comparisons are made to other sports leagues including collegiate athletics and individual sports.

Key Words: competitive balance • baseball economics • inequality • supply and demand

Journal of Sports Economics, Vol. 4, No. 4, 255-279 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1527002503257321
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
R. Fort
Comments on ``Measuring Parity''
Journal of Sports Economics, December 1, 2007; 8(6): 642 - 651.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
H. F. Lewis, T. R. Sexton, and K. A. Lock
Player Salaries, Organizational Efficiency, and Competitiveness in Major League Baseball
Journal of Sports Economics, June 1, 2007; 8(3): 266 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
R. G. Noll
The Economics of Baseball Contraction
Journal of Sports Economics, November 1, 2003; 4(4): 367 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]